|
Books by Chinweizu
The West and the Rest of Us
(1975) /
Decolonising the African Mind
(1987) /
Voices from
Twentieth-century Africa (1988)
Invocations and
Admonitions (1986);
Energy Crisis and Other Poems
(1978);
Anatomy of Female Power
(1990)
Towards the Decolonization of
African Literature (1980)
* *
* * *
Letter from Chinweizu
The Insolubility of the Color Line
Rudy hi: Happy New Year!
I am only now catching up and
reading your "powerless morality" pieces.
It saddens me to see fine minds,
the thinkers of our race, squandering their talent and
time on the wrong problems. This preoccupation with the
problem of inequality reminds me of the saying about
generals working out how to win the LAST war.
The problem of the color line has
been said and shown to be insoluble.
Addison Gayle, Jr. said so: “The
problem of the color line is insoluble”—Addison Gayle,
Jr. (1970)
And the history of the last 50
years in the USA has shown it to be so. Otherwise Bakke,
Jena, etc. would not have happened.
Let me put it more accurately: The
problem of the color line is insoluble within the narrow
context of the USA or the Diaspora.
It is not soluble until the
underlying problem of unequal power between whites and
blacks is solved.
Members of two groups with unequal
power cannot co-exist as equal individuals in a society.
Hence the problem of the color line
is the problem of lack of the Black African power that
will compel respect from the rest of humanity. it is not
a problem of morality. It will end only when, as Garvey
realized, we have created in Black Africa a country with
power of G-8 rank.
Only then will Blacks stop living
in a state of shame, and gain self-respect and the
respect of the rest of humanity. There is no other way.
It is mind boggling to see our
people today, in the 21st century, carrying on as if
Garvey never lived or spoke or wrote. We determinedly
evade his correct insight and prescription.
Besides, why can’t we focus our
minds on the problems of today and tomorrow? Namely, the
problem of our extermination that has been in process
for the last 30 years since the invention of AIDS by the
US Govt.
Why are we addicted to the problem
of inequality when we are being exterminated?
Our prime problem is no longer the
problem of inequality, but that of ongoing
extermination!!!
And the answer to this new problem,
which was also foretold by Garvey, is our creating
enough Black African power to stop the process.
How to create such power within the
next 50 years is the problem on our table, not how to
create equality between whites and blacks, women,
homosexuals, etc.—as your philosopher, Shelby, seems
to think.
If we are to set about creating
that power, we must cure ourselves of our addiction to
powerless moralizing. As they say, "We should keep our
eyes on the political donut of power, and not on the
morality hole!"
I hope you find the attached paper
useful for reconfiguring our new situation after the
disaster of integration.
Furthermore, I think we need to put
together an Anthology of Pan Africanist Thought and
Practice to help ground the next generation in knowledge
of what has been worked out in the last two centuries,
so they don't have to start from scratch as if a body
and tradition of reflections and proposed answers to our
changing problems did not exist.—Chinweizu
* *
* * *
Responses
Last night I heard
on internet radio a Garveyite Jamaican talking about the
African Union, as a representative of the Sixth Region,
the people of the Diaspora (MERLETTA).
This was after reading Bankie and thinking of you. I had
just posted this page
Lessons and Warnings from South Sudan. They
mentioned on the program Gaddafi's recent threats of
redirecting his oil wealth to Europe or the Middle East.
From the Garveyite rep for the Sixth Region, I am
uncertain where he knew of your fears and Bankie’s about
Arab racism and the Arab conspiracy with regard to Black
Africa. His main emphasis was getting the Sixth Region
recognized by the African Union and Diaspora residents
awarded full status as citizens of a United States of
Africa.
I follow events in Africa as closely as I can,
especially since the declaration of an "African
Renaissance" by Thabo Mbeki in 2003 and his speech I
Am an African. Of course I see no evidence of a
renaissance. Matters in Africa have worsened in the 21st
century. But still your dictum rings rather true: "Our
prime problem is no longer the problem of inequality,
but that of ongoing extermination!!!" That seems
especially true with major fratricidal conflicts
ongoing, as we see in Kenya. We seemingly are victims of
our own narrow politics in regard to what is the proper
relationship to have with the West and its globalist
economics.
The West makes
guns, sell them to us, and we murder each other. But
even without guns we have other instruments just as
effective, including the steady impoverishment of
African peoples by the reactionary governance of African
heads of state. What reform impact those in the
Diaspora can have on how these African governments treat
their own national residents, I suspect, is little or
nil.
I am not anti-Garvey. But I do wary of ideological
perspectives in which actions cannot match our high
notions of what might be or should be. So I am not
against you when you say, our oppression: "It will end
only when, as Garvey realized, we have created in Black
Africa a country with power of G-8 rank." I know that
China is generating power by standing "globalism" on its
head. But China participated in the globalist strategy
with an advantage: it had/has a regimented workforce
that it can exploit and even with several billion
peoples a historical (political and cultural) sense
of being one people so that they had a rather solid
foundation by which to gain a G-8 status. Such a
foundation and political and cultural perspective on the
whole is lost on most of Africa's peoples.
Yes, there need to be educational efforts. I have no
problem with this statement of yours either: "I think we
need to put together an Anthology of Pan Africanist
Thought and Practice to help ground the next generation
in knowledge of what has been worked out in the last two
centuries." Such materials I suspect are available for
the vanguard (intellectuals, journalists, propagandist,
writers and artists like ourselves.) Whether agreement
can be found widely in such perspectives is another
matter. Nevertheless, one more anthology will not hurt
and may be of some benefit. Overall, we cannot change
the perspectives of the hundreds of millions of African
peoples when most of these millions are illiterate or
semi-literate or are so debased that they have little
time or interest at all in reading "anthologies" or
anything else. There must be cadres who are willing to
live and work among Africa's vast peasantry and urban
workers for peace and nonviolence.
Of course, those few of us who are situated however
should do whatever we can. I am committed to that. But I
have little hope that actual progressive events on the
ground will take us forward as quickly as our thoughts.
The fellows, for instance, who are ideologically trying
to persuade and struggle for a Sixth Region of the
African Union have not even created the propaganda
networks to represent their thoughts and feelings, much
of which I found rather amorphous, a hodge-podge of
numerous "black histories" and "black sociologies."
The whole scheme of
it indeed reminds me of Garvey—grandiose and
grandiloquent—with few possibilities of carrying out
such projects among the peoples on which it will have an
impact. Such actions and events require financial
resources and people who are so committed to the long
struggle so that they will not misuse and abuse the
devoted people who turn over their work and dollars to
those who later turn out be scoundrels and demagogues,
hard-earned resources used for other purposes than a
higher level of consciousness and development.
You indeed may be right that the color line is an
insoluble proposition in the West and that there is a
necessity to gain political power through the coalescing
of African states into a superpower, or at least the
rank of a G-8 status. But finding on the continent of
Africa a stable political state willing to work with its
people and the peoples of other states in measured
economic justice is like finding a needle in a haystack.
We ever place the cart before the horse. So in practice,
it seems to me, Pan-Africanism is a zombie with only a
few adherents who keep such thoughts alive.
I have no confidence in Gaddafis or any of the heads of
African states to resolve the day to day difficulties of
African peoples. I have no confidence in an African
Union to speak to the needs of Darfurians or Haitians
(about 90% illiterate)—Haitians
Forced to Eat Dirt.
I will read your piece "Reparations and the Pan-African
War on Genocide," gladly and will probably publish it on
ChickenBones, for others as well to read. I have
great respect for you and your knowledge and commitment
to a coming renaissance of African peoples. Our own New
Negro renaissance was rather a failure. But most of us
too many of us are much like Garvey, great journalists
and propagandists. Few of us are shipping magnates,
industrialists, successful capitalists, billionaires, or
have the know-withal to force African states to get
their acts together to provide the basic essentials in
order to create an African renaissance among the masses
of African peoples.
Presently, I am not very enthusiastic about this third
wave of Pan-Africanism, which has not moved toward any
clarity to just what that is. The most hopeful aspects
of its growth has to do with the development of
technologies in which information can be quickly and
widely dispersed and the development of
relationships among a variety of peoples in Africa,
Europe, and the Americas. That pulling of together of
intellectuals—writers, artists, poets,
propagandists—provide some hope. But the pace of the
development on the ground is despairing.
Still I hope we can have a continual dialogue on such
matters. I look forward to our continued cooperation and
collaboration.—Rudy
* * *
* *
I had a conversation recently with an
Ethiopian fellow I once had a class with. He isn't
political, activist or intellectual or for that
matter at all much concerned with such things as this. I
asked him what he thought about Pan-Africanism. He said
man there are at least two or three different ideas
about what it means to be Ethiopian (or what is
Ethiopia), let alone the territorial differences of
opinion with Somalia, Eritrea and Sudan which are all undergirded
with hundreds of underlying language, religious, tribal
and economic considerations. I think the meaning of the
term Pan-Africanism is a lot easier to conceptualize
from our safe comfortable Western thought incubators
than it is to define on a subjective level on the
continent itself. —Vince
* * *
* *
I have lots of
problems with both Rudy and Chinweizu's perceptions.
Chinweizu wrote a book decades ago entitled
The West and the Rest of Us
[1975]. I don't remember what it was about. I do
know that Chinweizu is strident in his condemnations of
Arabs in Africa and promotes the idea of Arab
racism-which may or may not be real in my thinking.
Their discriminatory actions may be based on something
else or something less than racism, if you place racism
in its historical and economic contexts.
Rudy and
Chinweuzi's constant referencing Bankke in southern
Sudan is disturbing. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement
was brokered by the US in 2005 and calls for a
plebiscite to be held in 2011 which will allow southern
Sudanese to break away from Sudan, if they so vote, and
create their own nation. Sudan signed this agreement
with a gun to their heads and the US would like nothing
more than to see Sudan break up into two or three
different countries, all beholden to Washington. This is
one reason why Washington and Bush are prolonging the
Darfur crisis, to give the Darfurian rebels time and
opportunity to unite and create a breakaway state. What
is taking place in Darfur is not genocide but a civil
war. Our friends in the Jewish holocaust survivors camp
want us to believe otherwise—but these entreaties to us
from them are in the cause of US imperialism and oil.
Officials from the
US State Dept proudly announce that Southern Sudan
(GOSS) is America's third largest reclamation project in
the world; third only to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Blackwater has been hired to train the Southern Sudanese
army. So you can see how envisioning an African G8
power, based on globalized imperialism, is problematic
from a progressive point of view.—Jean Damu
* *
* * *
Jean, I have published a number of pieces by Bankie,
writing from Juba (South Sudan), and a number of pieces
by Chinweizu (See below). As a journalist I respect your
opinions and I respect theirs. I think theirs is much
closer to the truth of things.
There's a saying that politics make strange bedfellows.
I know that Israel and the United States provided some
support for/to the South Sudanese in their struggles
against Khartoum when most were silent, including India
and China, two nations with Khartoum contracts and who
probably benefit the most from Sudanese oil.
I am
quite unfamiliar with the international politics of
GOSS. I know that they are not angels and Bankie has
pointed out some corruption within that government. I do
not know that Bankie and Chenweizu necessarily want the
break up of Sudan into rival states. Bankie has
specifically stated, "The change of government in
Khartoum will happen, after which the creation of
the New Sudan would take ten years or less to construct,
which was John Garang’s project" (Lessons and
Warnings from South Sudan). The
break up is indeed optional and leverage if there is an
impossibility of creating in the present Sudan a
democratic state that recognizes the rights of all its
citizens, including Nubians, Darfurians, and the South
Sudanese.
My
view is that Arab racism exists inside Sudan as well as
outside. Whether there is a conscious international and
historical Arab conspiracy, I am uncertain. But I am
quite willing to give both Bankie and Chinwizu the
benefit of the doubt and place that charge on the table.
Thus, we have published the views of both Chinweizu and
Bankie:
Chinweizu
Reparations for Darfur
USAfrica: A Mortal Danger for Black
Africans
Racism: Arab and European Compared
Black
Enslavement: Arab and European Compared
Bankie
Discussion
of Arab Racism in Africa
South Sudan
in Sudan-Situation Analysis
Pan-African
Nationalist Thought and Practice
To suggest that GOSS, the South Sudanese; the Darfurians;
and the Nubans; as well as Chinweizu and Bankie are
pawns of Israel and the US government; seems to me to go
too far. I do not believe that is true. That notion
never entered my mind. What indeed entered my mind was
that the threats of Arab states in Africa and outside
Africa are indeed real and that Bankie and Chinweizu are
right to be suspicious of Arab machinations in Africa.
It
seems also right that the South Sudanese, the Nubians,
and the Darfurians need to think first and foremost of
their own peoples and their development. That help is
not coming from Khartoum. One must take help from
wherever quarter it comes when the situation is
desperate and so if that means it comes from Western
powers so be it. Here are other articles we have
published that might furnish farther insight to the
crises of Sudan
With
the Lost Boys in Southern Sudan Blood,
Ink, and Oil
President Omar al-Beshir
South Africa and Darfur -- Fact Sheet
Let
me add that I am not supportive of US involvement in
Ethiopia and Eritrea and Somalia. The situation in Sudan
seems quite different. The charge that the US is
dragging out the Darfur displacement of Darfurians because it seeks
Sudan oil and that there is no real genocide taking
place in Darfur seems rather cynical and not progressive
at all.—Rudy
* *
* * *
Pan-Africanism is a
beautiful idea (and should be the ultimate solution to
Africa's problems) but at this point the conditions for
African unity are in the same condition as Black
Americans returning to Africa. Too much has happened and
too much time has passed to force a workable fit at this
point. The best that can be done going forward is to
inspire intra-continental trade, joint infrastructure
projects, resource maximization schemes and cultural
exchanges on a neighboring country by country or
regional basis. If the individual nations can find a
reasonable level of domestic harmony and prosperity
then things may organically take shape towards the goal
of Pan-Africanism as various barriers come down and
problems are solved.
A scheme for
forcing all 53 countries to become one nation doesn't
take into account that the 53 countries are an illusion,
but the hundreds and hundreds of language, tribal,
religious and customs are a reality. Just the
unification of Nigeria and Niger would require a century
of negotiations, compromises, and changes.
The sad thing is
that it shouldn't be impossible for those 53
countries as it were to convene their best political
scientists, economists, doctors, educators, and military
men to figure out how to form alliances for mutual
benefit where possible towards the goal of benefiting
from the strengthening of the continent as a whole. Just
as sad as Western elites believing they have all the
answers to Africa's problems is that the brightest and
best on the continent don't seem to be able to figure
out how to fix the problems of government, economics,
health, and education that exist in some form on every
other continent.—Vince
* *
* * *
Rudy,
As a woman and
mother who is Half-Arab and comes from Sudan, I could
just wring Jean Damu's ignorant neck. I am so sick of
these selfish, indolent Black American bastards who
refuse to open their eyes and see what is going in
Sudan.
Jean Damu places
his own relationship with Israel and the U.S. above the
needs of millions of Black Africans in South Sudan who
desperately need intervention—regardless of where that
intervention comes from.
My birth parents
were executed in Omdurman, Sudan for opposing the
beginnings of Arab-financed slavery. My father being
Arab didn't stop him from being branded a pow Abeed
("nigger-lover") and being murdered for speaking out.
The chronic rape of
Dinka/Nuer Children...their enslavement by Arabs in the
North and the literal chaining of black men to the back
doors of houses so that they can be fed from Doggie
Bowls and unchained "to work" is quite real.
What difference
does it make who will be the one to set South Sudan
free?
Would it be better
if racist Chinese and hateful, Imperialist French set us
free?
NO—it makes NO
difference!
We need Israel and
we need the U.S. to use their might to bring change to
South Sudan.
Unfortunately,
there will be consequences for this, but it's absurd and
STUPID for Jean Damu to suggest that there would not be
the same consequences any other way. The South Sudan is
powerless, poor and completely broken, therefore, there
are going to be consequences . . . and that's just life.
But the important
thing is that Sudan needs a chance at life, and Sudan
needs to adopt DEMOCRACY and get rid of the Colonialism
of Arab Muslim Imperialism that is destroying North and
East Africa.
How utterly
disgusting for Black Americans, people who have been
literally created by a White Slavemaster, to now defend
and prescribe that Black Africans should remain in an
abusive relationship with our Arab Slavemaster—that we
should accept genocide, slavery and blatant racism
as spoils in lieu of "friendship" with an evil race who
believe they are superior and more human that Black
Africans are.
Jean Damu is a
complete and total fool and an enemy of ALL black people
if he/she cannot fathom the rank idiocy in leaving South
Sudanese to perish just because he/she has a disdain for
a Jewish state providing assistance.
Let it be
remembered that Sudan is the mother of the Jews, not
Ethiopia, as the Ethiopia spoken of in the Bible was
actually the continent of Africa and its capital was in
Nubia/Kush (Sudan) and not in the nation we know
as Ethiopia today.
Let it be
remembered that the very first Cushitic language was a
Hebrew language.
Let it be
remembered that many of the South Sudanese are the
original Cushitic people and they are the parents of the
Jewish people, including the Falasha.
Let it be remembered that Sudan has
two bastard children—the Arab and the Jew and that the
worst, most racist and violent of the two is the Arabs,
not the Jews.
Let Black American "Afrocentrics"
be confronted with the FACTS.
Israel is no more racist than the
United States, and when Jean Damu "DEFECTS" from the
racist white United States, then he/she will have more
credence to castigate the racist white Israel.
Israel is LESS racist than
Palestine.
I have lived in Israel, and as a
dark skinned black woman, I could get a husband in
Israel long before I could get one in Palestine if I had
to.
In 2011, South Sudan (New Kush)
will begin the process of starting its own nation. The
entire Arab world is going to be against it, because
they don't want to lose their Slave Colony.
The only country in the Middle East
that considers the Arab World its enemy, other than
South Sudan—is Israel.
Like all nations, South Sudan will
need allies, and it is far and away in our best interest
to align with Israel.
The days of Farrakhan Politics are
dying away, and the time of "strategic intelligence" is
coming into view, as we recognize that NO NATION is
a true friend to the African continent—none. But we
must be wise and utilize what we can from any and all.
We need to use Israel and the U.S.
just as much as they need to use us.
As National ChairWoman of Sudan's
SSPP, let me close using the motto of the ancient
Nubians: "So let it be written...so let it be done."
Kola Boof
* *
* * *
* *
* * *
Like all nations, South Sudan will
need allies, and it is far and away in our
best interest to align with Israel.—Kola
I rest my case.—Jean |
With all due
respect, your last remark is not an argument. That one
aligns oneself with another nation that is involved in
undesirable behavior, the oppression of the
Palestinians, does not preclude in itself accepting help
from them in one's own complicated situation. That
seems only to show the desperation of the South
Sudan-Darfur situation. Are you also critical of China
and India for buying oil from a government that
displaces and enslaves its citizens? Successful politics
involve making decisions that involve complexities and
contradictions.
It seems to me that
you are not taking the whole history of what has
occurred in South Sudan and in Darfur and in upper Nubia.
Your ideological stance against Israel sympathizing with
the misery of Palestinians while overlooking the misery
of South Sudan and Darfur lacks balance. The USSR by its
situation was forced in WWII to make the difficult
choice of siding with the Allies against the Nazis.
I still wonder why
Bashir of Sudan is giving a pass by the US government
while we firmly condemn and demonize Mugabe—Rudy
* *
* * *
Dear Kola Boof,
Gee Kola, I've always spoken highly
of you.
Well, I just re-read your letter to
Rudy. As my brothers and sisters from the south (Mexico)
would say, "Aye yae yae!"
Dear Rudi,
Genocide has become
one of the most politicized terms on the face of the
planet. I attended a Save Darfur meeting about a year
ago and asked, "Where were you guys when 1,000 people a
day were dying in Angola?" No one responded.
You could ask
today, what about the eastern Congo? Why does no one
raise issues about that horrific, US inspired madness?
If the Rwanda Patriotic Front (who we armed and trained)
were Islamic, there'd be hell to pay.
Have you examined
how it is the US came to declare Darfur genocide? How
does one explain Congress passing a resolution declaring
Darfur genocide even before the State Dept. reached that
conclusion? And just as Congress never passed an
anti-lynching law, they never passed a resolution
declaring Rwanda genocide despite the fact that more
people died in a shorter period of time in Rwanda than
at any time since the bombing of Hiroshima. Why did
Congress act so quickly on the issue of Darfur?
Colin Powell was
instructed by the White House to ask the UN to declare
Darfur genocide. At that time they refused saying, the
US had already declared it genocide and Washington was
doing no more than looking for a pre-determined
conclusion.
Finally, only the
politically naive or dishonest say they can use
imperialism to their advantage. You don't use
imperialism. It uses you!
I could write more
here but google my articles on Africom (and note the
Army War College discussion on redrawing the map of
Arica) and "Does God work for the CIA?"
Also google Keith Harmon Snow's
article "The US's War in Darfur."
Peace—from your selfish,
indolent Black American bastard brother—Damu
* *
* * *
Kola Responds to
Jean Damu, and Others
To all,
You don't need to
ask the US government if there is a genocide in Sudan.
Ask us Blacks who
are FROM Sudan.
I am the novelist
Kola Boof, a Half-Arab woman who was born in Omdurman,
Sudan.
My real name (my
Arab name) is Naima Bint Harith.
My Birth
parents—Arab Egyptian archeologist Harith Bin Farouk and
Jiddi, a Black Oromo Nomadic woman who was SOLD by her
black father "for marriage" at age 14—were murdered in
my presence for speaking out against the Slave Trade in
South Sudan.
As a child, I
witnessed seeing slaves in North Sudan. Tied up to the
back of Arab houses and fed out of doggie bowls.
I was adopted by
Black Americans—Marvin and Claudine Johnson of
Washington D.C. and was raised here in the U.S.
As an adult, I
returned to North Africa, and I witnessed first hand,
the continued "color caste" enslavement, bombings by
Arabs on Black villages to kill off the "abeed"
(niggers) so that the Arabs could build Oil Fields on
those African sacred grounds, and I am here to tell
you....as well...that the GENOCIDE in Sudan is
"understated," not "over-stated."
This past month,
Jan. 2008, the African Global Congress appointed me to
be National Chairwoman of the Sudanese Sensitization
Peace Project, the headquarters of which is based in
Juba, Sudan and is an off-shoot of the South Sudanese
government.
I have also been a
member of the SPLA, and in 2003, I was able to get the
Israelis to send guns, ammunition, food and medicine to
the South Rebel Army in Sudan so that we
could defend our people in the South against the racist
Arabs of the North.
I really don't give
a fuck what you think about me.
But your pathetic
"brown brothers" bullshit...as it relates to Arabs,
Latinos and all others who have done absolutely NOTHING
to deserve such an honor...is beyond tiresome.
Arabs and Latinos
don't give a fuck about your self-hating, color struck
asses!
I have a dream . .
. that you'll soon wake the fuck up and figure that fact
out.
So be insulted.
But me, a Black
Egyptian-Sudanese woman, I will fight for the Black
Sudanese and I will welcome the help of all those who
are for the liberation of MY people—as I reject my White
father's Arab clan and now claim the Dinka and the Nuer.
I will welcome the
help from Israel and continue to curse the rotten
Brown-skinned Satanic Rat-fuck Arabs that you Black
Americans love so goddamned much.
I was born Islamic,
but I sure as hell fucking despise it TODAY!
You can take Islam
and Christianity and stick them both where the sun don't
shine!
I don't do slave
religion.
Tell me, Cynthia
Mckinney, since I see your name on this list—is your
pussy cut up and stitched back together 12 different
ways for Allah like mine is?
Have you ever had
your menstrual period through a straw?
Do you think
yourself a "proud African sister" while you bash Jews
but make deals with these Satanic Arab Muslim
motherfuckers who call you "Sister" on American soil but
call you "Nappy Ass ABEED bitch" back in Africa???
And then I see the
name "Earl Ofari Hutchison" . . . a light skinned man
who wrote in the Washington Post newspaper that "colorism"
doesn't exist in America, that his mother could nearly
be mistaken for white (which is obviously why he
couldn't relate to the suffering of Marita Golden or
countless other "authentic Black women" right here in
the USA) . . . and you tell me that THIS MAN is supposed
to tell me about Sudan and what's best for us???
I've been wanting
to spit in your yellow face for 2 years over that
goddamned bullshit review you wrote!!!!
You don't know a
goddamned thing about BLACK women and what we go
through!
Let me make it
plain. . . . I do not support the Arab Muslim
Nations and I do not support Palestine—Palestinians in
Port Sudan kicked holes in my Uncle's stomach because he
was "Promoted" to Foreman on the job and they didn't
want to take orders from Abeed (nigger).
He died with his
mouth in the dust. A black man kicked to death by White
Arabs in his own country.
And who in the hell
do you smart fucks think FINANCES these "Black Arabs" in
Sudan to do the murdering and terrorizing???
So do not send me
your goddamned phoney ass "Afrocentric" Plantation
Nigger-Farrakhan bullshit!
You don't like what
this African Sudanese MOTHER has to say? Then fuck
you!
I will continue to
stand with Israel against the Arab world . . . because
we have that little in common, and that little is all it
takes.
tima usrah
(through fire comes
the family)
Kola Boof
* *
* * *
Jean, I am
surprised you are not moved by Kola's passion and
the horror of her experiences. You seem to have shut
down your heart and finer sentiments and are paying
more attention to the machinations occurring in
Washington, than what is happening on the ground in
Darfur and South Sudan. You are right with regard to
the subterfuges in Washington. But there is more
happening than these conspiracies you see.
I am not an
advocate of Africom. Nor did I support Clinton's
response to Rwanda. Nor do I support the present
silence with regard to the Congo. But all of those
actions seem besides the point. Like you I too lack
direct on the ground experience with regard
to Sudan. I know too there are silences with regard
to Bashir and the ethnic cleansing going on in the
Sudan.
But I have read
enough reports and articles, from numerous
quarters, that I am convinced that terrible crimes
have originated from and committed by Khartoum and
Bashir. Why you are silent on this matter undermines
your credibility.As I said before I respect your
views on a number of issues and as a result I have
been more than pleased to publish some of your
articles. But it seems in the case of Sudan you
cannot see the trees for the forest. I have no
understanding of your blindness and hard-heartedness
with regard to what is happening to the peoples of
Darfur, South Sudan, and Nubia. It is much too
profound and after several exchanges you have not
moved one iota in explaining why you have taken such
a hard line with regard to the sufferings of these
African peoples.—Rudy * *
* * *
Dear Rudy:
I have noticed
how, in several email discussions between Afrikans,
there is a handful of decoy artists whose deliberate
role is to distract us from the vital issue on hand.
The same thing is happening here.
Notice how Jean
Damu has subtly hijacked the focus here from African
powerless moralizing and the project of Black
African power—the subject of the initial exchange
between you and me—and has imposed the decoy issue
of his anti-Americanism that is both fanatically
pro-Arab and extremely anti-Afrikan.
I personally do
not engage in discussions with Afrophobic Afrikans
like the Jean Damus of this world. For, as Confucius
said: “There is no point in people taking counsel
together who follow different ways.”
In my view,
those Afrikans, who on the altar of their
anti-Americanism will gladly sacrifice Black
Africans to the Arab enemy, are basically anti-Afrikan.
They are Afrophobic Afrikans incurably disoriented
by Arabophilia; and they are bent not only on
cutting off Black Africa’s nose to spite America’s
face but also on helping the Arabs to destroy the
Black Africans. Hence, in my Confucian view,
Afrophobes have no place in a discussion among
Afrikans.
So, Rudy, as we
are in your space, would you please refocus this
discussion and keep it on track? See to it that we
don’t fall prey to Arabophile decoy artists who are
keen to keep us away from discussing and figuring
out what to do about the matter of our ongoing
extermination by both the Arabs and the Europeans.
Please, let
those Afrikans who are not Afrophobic take counsel
together in your space, and study the extremely
urgent matter of our extermination.
To help refocus
the discussion, you might perhaps link this
discussion page to that attachment [“Reparation and
the African War on Genocide”] which I sent with my
initial letter, and link it also to my BPPA#6 on
Khartoum’s scheming. Thank you.—Chinweizu
* *
* * * Dear
Everyone,
I have in my basement some long
unused US flags you all can wave as you kick me to
the curb. Also, I'm canceling my subscription to
Israel Today. Have a nice day—Jean
Damu
* *
* * *
Of course we still love you.
Especially me. When blacks fight, it means nothing
really.
We just don't agree, but in my
secret heart...I love everyone. That is why I become
so upset.—Kola Boof
* *
* * *
update 27 July 2008 |